Point Made How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates 2nd Edition by Ross Guberman – Ebook PDF Instant Download/Delivery: 0199967970, 9780199967971
Full download Point Made How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates 2nd edition after payment

Product details:
ISBN 10: 0199967970
ISBN 13: 9780199967971
Author: Ross Guberman
With Point Made, legal writing expert, Ross Guberman, throws a life preserver to attorneys, who are under more pressure than ever to produce compelling prose. What is the strongest opening for a motion or brief? How to draft winning headings? How to tell a persuasive story when the record is dry and dense? The answers are “more science than art,” says Guberman, who has analyzed stellar arguments by distinguished attorneys to develop step-by-step instructions for achieving the results you want. The author takes an empirical approach, drawing heavily on the writings of the nation’s 50 most influential lawyers, including Barack Obama, John Roberts, Elena Kagan, Ted Olson, and David Boies. Their strategies, demystified and broken down into specific, learnable techniques, become a detailed writing guide full of practical models. In FCC v. Fox, for example, Kathleen Sullivan conjures the potentially dangerous, unintended consequences of finding for the other side (the “Why Should I Care?” technique). Arguing against allowing the FCC to continue fining broadcasters that let the “F-word” slip out, she highlights the chilling effect these fines have on America’s radio and TV stations, “discouraging live programming altogether, with attendant loss to valuable and vibrant programming that has long been part of American culture.”Each chapter of Point Made focuses on a typically tough challenge, providing a strategic roadmap and practical tips along with annotated examples of how prominent attorneys have resolved that challenge in varied trial and appellate briefs. Short examples and explanations with engaging titles–“Brass Tacks,” “Talk to Yourself,” “Russian Doll”–deliver weighty materials with a light tone, making the guidelines easy to remember and apply.In addition to all-new examples from the original 50 advocates, this Second Edition introduces eight new superstar lawyers from Solicitor General Don Verrilli, Deanne Maynard, Larry Robbins, and Lisa Blatt to Joshua Rosencranz, Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Judy Clarke, and Sri Srinvasan, now a D.C. Circuit Judge. Ross Guberman also provides provocative new examples from the Affordable Care Act wars, the same-sex marriage fight, and many other recent high-profile cases. Considerably more commentary on the examples is included, along with dozens of style and grammar tips interspersed throughout. Also, for those who seek to improve their advocacy skills and for those who simply need a step-by-step guide to making a good brief better, the book concludes with an all-new set of 50 writing challenges corresponding to the 50 techniques.
Point Made How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates 2nd Table of contents:
Introduction
PART ONE The Theme
1. Brass Tacks: Explain “who, what, when, where, why, how”
Eric Holder, In re Chiquita Banana
Joshua Rosenkranz, Facebook, Inc. v. ConnectU, Inc.
Fred Bartlit, Pinpoint v. Amazon
Brendan Sullivan, Greg Craig, and Nicole Seligman, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner
David Boies and Ted Olson, Hollingsworth v. Perry
Bernie Nussbaum, IBP v. Tyson Foods
Larry Robbins, United States v. Bayly
2. The Short List: Number your path to victory
A. Your list is governed by factors or rules
Seth Waxman, MercExchange v. eBay
B. You need to address threshold questions before addressing the merits
Ted Olson, Robinson v. Bowen
C. Your dispute is complex or fact-driven
Maureen Mahoney, Grutter v. Bollinger
Larry Tribe, Gratz v. Bollinger
Brendan Sullivan, United States v. Forbes
Ted Olson, Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish
D. You need to regain the offensive in response to your opponent’s arguments
Kathleen Sullivan, SEC v. Siebel Systems
Herbert Wachtell, NFL Enterprises v. EchoStar Satellite
David Boies, Weinstein v. Smokewood Entertainment
3. Why Should I Care?: Give the court a reason to want to find for you
A. The fear of misconstruing a doctrine or statute
Carter Phillips, Miller-El v. Dretke
Stephen Shapiro, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlantica
Barack Obama, Tyus v. Bosley
B. The fear of creating new duties, rules, or defenses
Jamie Gorelick, Carrington v. Duke University
Larry Lessig, Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books
C. The fear of reaching an unfair result or causing harm
Greg Craig, United States v. Conrad Black
Bernie Nussbaum, Judith Kaye v. Sheldon Silver
Stephen M. Shapiro, Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
Stephen M. Shapiro, Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc.
Kathleen Sullivan, FCC v. Fox
Ted Olson, MGM v. Grokster
Paul Smith, Keepseagle v. Vilsack
4. Flashpoint: Draw a line in the sand
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Walter Dellinger, Rumsfeld v. FAIR
John Roberts, Smith v. Doe
Morgan Chu, TiVo v. EchoStar
Mary Jo White, Trump v. O’Brien
Nancy Abell, Jackson v. Microsoft
Roy Englert, Federal Insurance Company v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Pulling the techniques together: a preliminary statement dissected
Ted Wells, Terra Firma v. Citigroup
PART TWO The Tale
Fred Bartlit, Stumpf v. Garvey
5. Panoramic Shot: Set the stage and sound your theme
Ted Wells, Terra Firma v. Citigroup
Joe Jamail, In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation
Larry Tribe, Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm
Andy Frey, BMW v. Gore
Carter Phillips, Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church v. City of New York
Joshua Rosenkranz, Facebook, Inc. v. ConnectU, Inc.
6. Show, Not Tell: Let choice details speak for themselves
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
John Payton and the NAACP, In re Alper Holdings USA
Pattie Millett, United States v. Stevens
Harvey Miller, In re General Motors
Eric Holder, Butler v. MBNA
Steven Shapiro and the ACLU, Hudson v. Michigan
Ted Cruz, Van Orden v. Perry
7. Once Upon a Time: Replace dates with phrases that convey a sense of time
Larry Tribe, Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action v. Granholm
Eric Holder, Butler v. MBNA
David Boies and Ted Olson, Perry v. Brown
Morgan Chu, eBay v. IDT
8. Headliners: Use headings to break up your fact section and to add persuasive effect
Department of Justice, United States v. Stewart
Seth Waxman, In re Winstar Communications
Steve Susman, Capitol Justice LLC v. Wachovia Bank, N.A.
Fred Bartlit, Stumpf v. Garvey
9. Back to Life: Center technical matter on people or entities
Seth Waxman, MercExchange v. eBay
Carter Phillips, Lucent Technologies v. Gateway
Interlude: Gauging your brief’s readability
10. Poker Face: Concede bad facts, but put them in context
Larry Lessig, Aguiar v. Webb
Ted Olson, Citizens United v. United States
Mary Jo White, In re Bank of America Corporation Securities, Derivative and ERISA Litigation
Miguel Estrada, Black v. United States
Paul Clement, United States v. Bond
11. End with a Bang: Leave the court with a final image or thought
Brendan Sullivan, Brendsel v. Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight
David Boies, Weinstein v. Smokewood Entertainment
PART THREE The Meat
Using Headings
Thurgood Marshall, Sweatt v. Painter
12. Russian Doll: Nest your headings and subheadings
Ted Wells, Terra Firma v. Citigroup
Kathleen Sullivan, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin
Carolyn Lamm, Inversiones & Servicios, S.A. de C.V. v. Barceló Hospitality USA
Richard Wiley, In re XM-Sirius Merger
Larry Robbins, Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
13. Heads I Win, Tails You Lose: Argue in the alternative
Eric Holder, In re Chiquita Banana
Walter Dellinger, Exxon v. Baker
Interlude: Love “because”
Fred Bartlit, Micron v. Rambus
John Payton and the NAACP, Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center v. HUD
John Payton and the NAACP, Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center v. HUD
Andy Frey, BlackRock Financial Management Inc. v. Ambac Assurance Corp.
Organizing the Sections
14. Sneak Preview: Include an umbrella paragraph before your headings and subheadings
Roy Englert, Armour v. Indianapolis
Morgan Chu, eBay v. IDT
Alan Dershowitz and Greg Craig, Mamani v. Bustamante
15. With You in Spirit: Start each paragraph by answering a question that you expect the court to have
Jones v. Clinton: Original
Jones v. Clinton: Revision
Thurgood Marshall, Brown v. Board of Education
Seth Waxman, MercExchange v. eBay
Ted Olson, Office of Independent Counsel v. Favish
Ted Wells, Terra Firma v. Citigroup
16. Sound Off: Start the paragraphs with numbered reasons
Ted Wells, Terra Firma v. Citigroup
Maureen Mahoney, Arthur Andersen v. United States
Judy Clarke, United States v. Loughner
Analogizing
17. Long in the Tooth: Say “me too”
Greg Garre, Weber v. Infinity Broadcasting
David Boies, Smith Wholesale v. Phillip Morris
Don Verrilli, Arizona v. United States
Sri Srinivasan and Deanne Maynard, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood
Nancy Abell, Burch v. Coca-Cola
Frank Easterbrook, United States v. Crittenden
18. Peas in a Pod: Link your party with the party in the cited case
Seth Waxman, In re Winstar Communications
Herbert Wachtell, Barron v. Igolnikov
19. Mince Their Words: Merge pithy quoted phrases into a sentence about your own case
Ted Olson and David Boies, Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Miguel Estrada, Sanders v. Madison Square Garden
Sri Srinivasan and Deanne Maynard, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood
20. One Up: Claim that the case you’re citing applies even more to your own dispute
Larry Tribe, Larkin v. Grendel’s Den
Greg Garre, Weber v. Infinity Broadcasting
Paul Clement, Florida v. Dep’t of Health & Human Services
Jamie Gorelick, Carrington v. Duke University
21. Interception: Claim that a case your opponent cites helps you alone
Walter Dellinger, United States v. Stewart
22. Rebound: “Re-analogize” after the other side tries to distinguish
Andy Frey, Elbit Systems v. Credit Suisse Group
Virginia Seitz, Williams v. Mohawk Industries
Richard Taranto, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Distinguishing
23. Not Here, Not Now: Lead with the key difference between your opponent’s case and your own
Mary Jo White, Trump v. O’Brien
Ted Olson, MGM Studios v. Grokster
Paul Smith, Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Eric Holder, Barham v. UBS
John Quinn, Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
Richard Taranto, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
24. One Fell Swoop: Distinguish a line of cases all at once
Maureen Mahoney, Toy Industry Association v. City and County of San Francisco
Larry Lessig, Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books
John Payton and Seth Waxman, Northwest Austin Utility District Number One v. Gonzales
John Quinn, Lehman Brothers Holding Inc. v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Patrick Fitzgerald, United States v. Burge
25. Not So Fast: Show that the case does not apply as broadly as your opponent suggests
Miguel Estrada, Sanders v. Madison Square Garden
Seth Waxman, In re Winstar Communications
David Boies, American Express Travel Related Services Company v. Visa
Roy Englert, Federal Insurance Company v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Sri Srinivasan and Deanne Maynard, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood
Tom Goldstein, Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
26. Authority Problems: Suggest that the case deserves little respect
Deanne Maynard, KFC Corporation v. Iowa Department of Revenue
Paul Smith, Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Association
Bob Bennett, Miller v. United States
Frank Easterbrook, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Alan Dershowitz and Greg Craig, Mamani v. Bustamante
Using Parentheticals
Former Third Circuit Chief Judge Ruggero Aldisert
United States v. Madoff
27. Ping Me: Introduce your parentheticals with parallel participles
Morgan Chu, eBay v. IDT
Ken Starr, Morse v. Frederick
Steven Shapiro and the ACLU, Mary Berghuis v. Diapolis Smith
Virginia Seitz, C.B.C. Distribution and Marketing v. MLB Advanced Media
28. Speak for Yourself: Include a single-sentence quotation
Paul Clement, Jimenez v. DaimlerChrysler
Walter Dellinger, United States v. Stewart
29. Hybrid Model: Combine participles and quotations
Greg Craig, United States v. Henry T. Nicholas, III
Kathleen Sullivan, Adidas v. Payless
Introducing Block Quotations
30. Lead ‘Em On: Introduce block quotations by explaining how they support your argument
Steven Shapiro and the ACLU, Mary Berghuis v. Diapolis Smith
Walter Dellinger, Exxon v. Baker
Carter Phillips and Virginia Seitz, Grutter v. Bollinger
Judy Clarke, United States v. Loughner
Using Footnotes
Interlude: Citations in footnotes
31. Race to the Bottom: Use footnotes only in moderation to address related side points and to add support
Andy Frey, Catskill Litigation Trust v. Park Place Entertainment
Steven Shapiro and the ACLU, Wilson v. Layne
Mary Jo White, Trump v. O’Brien
Ted Olson, California v. GM
Richard Taranto, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
PART FOUR The Words
Liven Up the Language
32. Zingers: Colorful words
Brendan Sullivan, Greg Craig, and Nicole Seligman, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner
Brendan Sullivan, Greg Craig, and Nicole Seligman, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner
Joe Jamail, In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation
David Boies, In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
Paul Smith, Gill v. Office of Personnel Management
Alan Dershowitz, In re People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran
Larry Robbins, United States v. Bayly
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Craig v. Boren
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Walter Dellinger, Bank of America v. Cleveland
Morgan Chu, TiVo v. EchoStar
Larry Lessig and Kathleen Sullivan, Eldred v. Ashcroft
Bernie Nussbaum, Crest v. Wal-Mart Stores
Roy Englert, District Attorney for the Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
Tom Goldstein, Moncrieffe v. Holder
Joshua Rosenkranz, MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
Deanne Maynard and Joshua Rosenkranz, TiVo Inc. v. EchoStar Corporation
Ken Starr and Eric Holder, McDonald v. United States
Larry Robbins, Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
John Payton and the NAACP, Greater New Orleans Fair Housing Action Center v. HUD
Bob Bennett, United States v. Miller
Interlude: 50 Zinger Verbs
33. What a Breeze: Confident tone
Larry Tribe, Larkin v. Grendel’s Den
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Craig v. Boren
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Pattie Millett, United States v. Stevens
Larry Lessig, Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books
Herbert Wachtell, NFL Enterprises v. EchoStar Satellite
Nancy Abell, Jackson v. Microsoft
Richard Wiley, Comsat v. FCC
Brendan Sullivan, Greg Craig, and Nicole Seligman, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner
Morgan Chu, Brunskill Associates v. Rapid Payroll
34. Manner of Speaking: Figures of speech
Joe Jamail, In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation
David Boies, Renton v. Kaiser
David Boies, In re Vitamins Antitrust Litigation
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Don Verrilli, Arizona v. United States
Maureen Mahoney, Arthur Andersen v. United States
Morgan Chu, Tessera v. United Test and Assembly Center
Joe Jamail, In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation
Joe Jamail, In re Sunbeam Securities Litigation
Brendan Sullivan, Greg Craig, and Nicole Seligman, Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner
35. That Reminds Me: Examples and analogies
David Boies and Joshua Rosenkranz, Oracle America v. Google
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Barack Obama, Tyus v. Bosley
Nancy Abell, Dukes v. Wal-Mart
Joshua Rosenkranz, MGA Entertainment, Inc. v. Mattel, Inc.
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Don Verrilli, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Morgan Chu, Tessera v. United Test and Assembly Center
Ted Cruz, Van Orden v. Perry
Ted Olson and David Boies, Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Greg Craig and Alan Dershowitz, Mamani v. Bustamante
Jamie Gorelick, Carrington v. Duke University
Maureen Mahoney, Arthur Andersen v. United States
Jumpstart Your Sentences
36. The Starting Gate: The one-syllable opener
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Stephen M. Shapiro, Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC
Miguel Estrada, Sanders v. Madison Square Garden
Richard Wiley, In re XM-Sirius Merger
Elena Kagan, United States v. Stevens
37. Size Matters: The pithy sentence
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
John Quinn, Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
John Payton and the NAACP, Greater New Orleans Fair Action Housing Center v. HUD
Morgan Chu, TiVo v. EchoStar
Bernie Nussbaum, IBP v. Tyson Foods
Don Verrilli, United States v. Jones
Nancy Abell, Doiwchi v. Princess Cruise Lines
Fred Bartlit, Stumpf v. Garvey
Richard Taranto, Morgan Stanley v. Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County
Carter Phillips, Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church v. City of New York
Roy Englert, Choose Life Illinois v. White
Ken Starr and Eric Holder, McDonald v. United States
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Greg Garre, Weber v. Infinity Broadcasting
Ted Wells, NAACP v. Ameriquest Mortgage Company
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Pattie Millett, United States v. Stevens
Maureen Mahoney and Greg Garre, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez EchoStar
Bernie Nussbaum, IBP v. Tyson Foods
Phil Corboy, Boyle v. RJW Transport
Miguel Estrada, FCC v. Fox
38. Freight Train: The balanced, elegant long sentence
Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Craig v. Boren
Lisa Blatt, Sorrell v. IMS Health
Patrick Fitzgerald, United States v. Blagojevich
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
39. Leading Parts: Two sentences joined as one
Greg Garre, Weber v. Infinity Broadcasting
Miguel Estrada, FCC v. Fox
Carter Phillips, Fifth Avenue Presbyterian Church v. City of New York
Lisa Blatt, Sorrell v. IMS Health
Seth Waxman, Boumediene v. Bush
Frank Easterbrook, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
40. Talk to Yourself: The rhetorical question
Kathleen Sullivan, SEC v. Siebel Systems
Bob Bennett, United States v. Scooter Libby
Maureen Mahoney, Arthur Andersen v. United States
Deanne Maynard and Joshua Rosenkranz, TiVo v. EchoStar Corporation
Larry Tribe, Larkin v. Grendel’s Den
Judy Clarke, United States v. Loughner
Brendan Sullivan, United States v. Ted Stevens
Richard Taranto, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Roy Englert, District Attorney for the Office for the Third Judicial District v. Osborne
Bernie Nussbaum, IBP v. Tyson Foods
Phil Corboy, Rodriguez v. Voss
41. Parallel Lives: The parallel construction
Carter Phillips, Lucent Technologies v. Gateway
Richard Taranto, Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Alan Dershowitz, In re People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran
Don Verrilli, Arizona v. United States
Larry Robbins, Chevron Corp. v. Donziger
John Payton and the NAACP, In re Alper Holdings USA
Ken Starr and John Roberts, Rust v. Sullivan
Nancy Abell, Dukes v. Wal-Mart
Barack Obama, Tyus v. Bosley
Paul Clement, Department of Health and Human Services v. Florida
Creative Punctuation
42. A Dash of Style: The dash
Elena Kagan, United States v. Stevens
Deanne Maynard, In re Tremont Securities
Harvey Miller, In re Motors Liquidation Co.
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Sri Srinivasan and Deanne Maynard, CompuCredit Corp. v. Greenwood
Tom Goldstein, Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
Elena Kagan, United States v. Stevens
Pattie Millett, United States v. Stevens
Ted Cruz, Van Orden v. Perry
Interlude: The hyphen
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
43. Good Bedfellows: The semicolon
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Larry Lessig, Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books
Stephen Susman, Sklar v. Bank of America
Frank Easterbrook, Kissinger v. Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
Don Verrilli, Arizona v. United States
Tom Goldstein, Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham
44. Magician’s Mark: The colon
Larry Tribe, Larkin v. Grendel’s Den
Barack Obama, Tyus v. Bosley
Walter Dellinger, Bank of America v. City of Cleveland
Brendan Sullivan, United States v. Ted Stevens
Herbert Wachtell, NFL Enterprises v. EchoStar Satellite
Seamless Flow
Virginia Seitz, Williams v. Mohawk Industries
45. Take Me by the Hand: Logical connectors
135 Transition Words and Phrases
Six former federal judges, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld
Seth Waxman, MercExchange v. eBay
Larry Lessig and Kathleen Sullivan, Eldred v. Ashcroft
Roy Englert, Federal Insurance Company v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
46. Bridge the Gap: Linked paragraphs
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Thurgood Marshall, Brown v. Board of Education
Seth Waxman, Arizona v. United States
Larry Tribe and Kathleen Sullivan, Romer v. Evans
Carolyn Lamm, Globe Nuclear Services and Supply v. AO Techsnabexport
Patrick Fitzgerald, Miller v. United States
Stephen Shapiro, Stoneridge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta
Ted Olson, Viacom v. YouTube
Interlude: Streamlining paragraphs
Visual Appeal
Interlude: Looking good
47. Join My Table: Tables and charts
David Boies, Renton v. Kaiser
Morgan Chu, Tessera v. United Test and Assembly Center
48. Bullet Proof: Bullet points and lists
Mary Jo White, Trump v. O’Brien
Nancy Abell, Jackson v. Microsoft
Harvey Miller, In re General Motors
Miguel Estrada, FCC v. Fox
Walter Dellinger, Bank of America v. Cleveland
PART FIVE The Close
The Last Word
49. Parting Thought: End the argument with a provocative quotation or pithy thought
Paul Smith, Lawrence v. Texas
Patrick Fitzgerald, United States v. Rogan
John Roberts, Alaska v. EPA
Morgan Chu, MedImmune v. Genentech
Maureen Mahoney and Greg Garre, Christian Legal Society v. Martinez
50. Wrap-Up: Recast your main points in a separate conclusion
Miguel Estrada, Sanders v. Madison Square Garden
Larry Lessig, Warner Bros. Entertainment v. RDR Books
Fred Bartlit, Stumpf v. Garvey
Brendan Sullivan, United States v. Ted Stevens
Richard Wiley and John Roberts, Advanced Communications Corporation v. FCC
Nancy Abell, Doiwchi v. Princess Cruise Lines
Ted Olson, California v. GM
PART SIX Appendices
The Top Advocates: Biographies
Annotated Models
Before-and-after section from Jones v. Clinton
Alaska v. EPA
MercExchange v. eBay
Fifty Writing Challenges
Index
People also search for Point Made How to Write Like the Nation’s Top Advocates 2nd:
point made how to write like the nation’s top advocates
point made how to write like the nation’s top advocates
point made how to write
points made in the declaration of independence
what is the point of making these markers personal
Tags: Ross Guberman, Point Made, the Nation’s, Top Advocates